36:"/_next/static/immutable/chunks/28s8sikd855yk.js" 37:"/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1kw0-lohfbelx.js" 38:"/_next/static/immutable/chunks/1ptqs-_ru4wh7.js" 39:"/_next/static/immutable/chunks/3npmhjfbbxttb.js" 3a:I[631314,["$6","$7","$18","$19","$1a","$1b","$1c","$1d","$1e","$1f","$20","$21","$22","$23","$24","$25","$26","$36","$37","$38","$39"],"default"] 3b:I[96039,["$6","$7","$18","$19","$1a","$1b","$1c","$1d","$1e","$1f","$20","$21","$22","$23","$24","$25","$26","$36","$37","$38","$39"],"default"] 40:I[27201,["$6","$7"],"IconMark"] 35:T6dc,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https://taxmaverick.ai/blogs/tax-planning-software-features-2026#article","url":"https://taxmaverick.ai/blogs/tax-planning-software-features-2026","headline":"What Features Should Tax Planning Software Include in 2026?","description":"Tax planning software features firms should require in 2026, covering modelling, integrations, security, audit trails, AI controls and evaluation criteria.","image":"https://taxmavblog.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Tax-Planning-Software-Include-in-2026.png","datePublished":"2026-10-28T12:53:16","dateModified":"2026-10-28T12:55:13","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https://taxmaverick.ai/blogs/tax-planning-software-features-2026#webpage"},"author":{"@type":"Person","name":"taxmavblog"},"publisher":{"@id":"https://taxmaverick.ai/#organization"},"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://taxmaverick.ai/blogs/tax-planning-software-features-2026#webpage","url":"https://taxmaverick.ai/blogs/tax-planning-software-features-2026","name":"Tax Planning Software Features: What to Require in 2026","isPartOf":{"@id":"https://taxmaverick.ai/#website"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https://taxmaverick.ai/blogs/tax-planning-software-features-2026#breadcrumb"}},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https://taxmaverick.ai/blogs/tax-planning-software-features-2026#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://taxmaverick.ai/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://taxmaverick.ai/blogs"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"What Features Should Tax Planning Software Include in 2026?","item":"https://taxmaverick.ai/blogs/tax-planning-software-features-2026"}]}]}3c:T163f5,

KEY TAKEAWAYS

Tax planning software models positions that have not yet been taken. It is never lodged with a revenue authority, so it is judged on assumption quality and documentation rather than acceptance acknowledgements.
A current-law calculation engine is the baseline requirement. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, enacted 4 July 2025, changed multiple provisions that planning models built on pre-2025 assumptions no longer reflect.
The Federal Trade Commission’s Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) requires multi-factor authentication and a written information security plan, which makes access control a purchasing requirement rather than a preference.
Audit trail and assumption logging matter because the general assessment period under Internal Revenue Code section 6501 is three years, extending to six years where more than 25 per cent of gross income is omitted.
There is no single “best tax planning software 2026” ranking. Fit depends on client mix, entity types, the existing compliance stack and staffing model.

Introduction

Tax planning software in 2026 should include eight capabilities: a current-law multi-year calculation engine, scenario and entity comparison modelling, integration with compliance and source data systems, client-facing deliverables, documented assumption and version tracking, role-based access with multi-factor authentication, transparent handling of any AI features, and an exportable data format.

Anything missing from that list becomes manual work absorbed by staff, or a control gap absorbed by the firm.

For firm owners and operations leads, the tax planning software features question is a risk and capacity question before it is a technology question. Planning outputs are advisory work products, and the practitioner remains responsible for their accuracy regardless of which tool produced them.

The evaluation also changed materially in the past two years. Legislative change, tightened data security enforcement and the arrival of AI-assisted research features mean a tool that was adequate in 2023 may not meet current requirements.

Tax planning software works well past tax season. It's not just a tool, it's a game-changer for advisors who want to offer truly holistic financial planning.

How does tax planning software differ from compliance software?

Tax planning software is prospective. It models positions that have not yet been taken, produces projections and advisory deliverables, and is never transmitted to a revenue authority. Compliance software is retrospective and produces the return that is actually lodged.

That difference changes how the tool must be evaluated. A compliance product succeeds or fails against a technical schema and an acceptance acknowledgement. A planning product has no such external check.

Because the output is advice rather than a filing, professional standards apply directly to it. Circular 230 section 10.37 (31 CFR Part 10) sets requirements for written advice, and the American Institute of CPAs’ revised Statements on Standards for Tax Services took effect on 1 January 2024, including a standard addressing tax planning services.

The practical consequence is that documentation quality inside the software carries weight that it does not carry in a compliance tool.

Which calculation and modelling features are non-negotiable?

Three modelling capabilities form the baseline: multi-year projection, entity structure comparison, and scenario branching. Without all three, the tool produces single-point estimates rather than planning analysis.

Why does multi-year projection matter?

Multi-year projection matters because most planning decisions shift income or deductions between periods rather than eliminating them. A single-year model cannot show whether a deferral produces a net benefit or simply relocates the liability.

Projection horizons should be configurable. Retirement, succession and instalment sale planning routinely require five to ten year views.

Why does entity comparison matter?

Entity comparison matters because the tax result of the same economic activity varies by structure. A credible tool models sole proprietorship, partnership, S corporation and C corporation treatment side by side, including payroll tax and qualified business income effects.

How current must the calculation engine be?

The engine must reflect enacted law, and the vendor should publish an update cadence. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act was enacted on 4 July 2025 and altered provisions that many existing models were built around, including the state and local tax deduction cap and bonus depreciation treatment. [needs source verification: confirm the specific provisions and effective dates against the enacted text before publication]

Annual parameters change independently of legislation. The IRS issues inflation adjustments each year in a revenue procedure, such as Revenue Procedure 2024-40 for tax year 2025, and a planning tool that has not ingested the current one will produce out-of-date thresholds.

Smarter Tax Planning Starts Here With Our Tax Planning AI Software

AI-powered insights designed to reduce liability and increase financial efficiency.

What integration and workflow features should firms require?

Integration requirements come down to three questions: what the tool can import, what it can export, and whether that happens without rekeying. Manual re-entry is the largest hidden cost in planning software.

At minimum, the tool should import prior-year return data from the firm’s compliance system, accept source documents, and export client deliverables in a portable format.

Workflow features matter at firm scale rather than individual scale. Task assignment, review status, engagement templates and standardised plan structures are what allow a planning process to be repeated consistently across staff.

Data handling in integrations carries obligations. IRS Publication 4557, “Safeguarding Taxpayer Data”, applies to how taxpayer information moves between systems, not only to how it is stored, so integration design is a compliance question as well as a convenience one.

What security and access controls are required in 2026?

Multi-factor authentication and a written information security plan are requirements, not options. The FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) applies to tax preparers as financial institutions, and section 314.4(c)(5) requires multi-factor authentication for any individual accessing information systems.

The rule’s amended requirements took effect on 9 June 2023. A further amendment effective 13 May 2024 requires notification to the FTC within 30 days of discovering a security event involving the unencrypted information of 500 or more consumers.

Role-based permissions should be granular enough to separate preparer, reviewer and administrator access. Shared logins defeat both the control and the audit trail.

IRS Publication 5708 provides a written information security plan template designed for smaller practices, which is a practical starting point for firms documenting these controls for the first time.

What documentation and audit trail features protect the firm?

Assumption logging, version history and dated snapshots are the features that make planning work defensible later. Without them, a firm cannot reconstruct what was known and assumed at the time advice was given.

Every scenario should record its inputs, the law version applied, the date generated and the person who generated it.

The retention horizon is set by statute rather than preference. Under Internal Revenue Code section 6501, the IRS generally has three years from filing to assess additional tax, extending to six years where more than 25 per cent of gross income is omitted, and there is no limit where no return is filed.

Version control also protects against a common failure mode: a client acting on a superseded scenario. If the software cannot mark a version as final and lock it, that risk sits with the firm.

Which client deliverable features actually get used?

The deliverables that get used are the ones a client can act on: a scenario comparison, an implementation checklist with responsible parties and dates, and an estimated payment schedule.

Presentation quality matters less than traceability. A deliverable that states its assumptions and effective date is more useful in twelve months than one that looks polished but is undated.

Estimated payment scheduling is a concrete example of a feature with a fixed rule behind it. Under Internal Revenue Code section 6654, individuals generally avoid the underpayment penalty by paying 90 per cent of the current year’s tax or 100 per cent of the prior year’s tax, rising to 110 per cent where prior-year adjusted gross income exceeded US$150,000.

A planning tool that calculates against those thresholds produces something the client can act on directly.

How should firms evaluate AI features in tax planning tools?

AI features should be evaluated on three criteria: whether outputs cite retrievable primary authority, whether the vendor discloses how firm data is used, and whether a human review step is enforced rather than optional.

Uncited AI output is unusable in a regulated advisory context. If the tool cannot link a conclusion to a code section, regulation or ruling that a reviewer can open, the conclusion cannot be relied upon.

Data usage terms need to be read specifically. Confirm in writing whether client data is used for model training, where it is processed, and how long it is retained.

Governance frameworks exist to structure this assessment. The National Institute of Standards and Technology published its AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) in January 2023, and Circular 230 section 10.35 requires practitioners to exercise competence, which is not delegated to a tool.

What does “best tax planning software 2026” actually depend on?

There is no universal ranking, because the variables that determine fit are firm-specific. The realistic comparison is between a tool and a firm’s own requirement list, not between vendors in the abstract.

Four factors carry most of the weight in practice:

Client mix. High-net-worth individual planning, small business entity work and multi-state clients each demand different modelling depth.
Existing compliance stack. Integration with the system already in use usually outweighs any single feature advantage.
Staffing model. Tools that assume a reviewer layer behave differently in a solo practice than in a fifteen-person firm.
Pricing structure. Per-user, per-client and per-plan pricing scale very differently as the practice grows.

Define the must have features for tax planning tools before demonstrations begin. Evaluating features in the order a vendor presents them produces a decision shaped by the vendor’s strengths rather than the firm’s needs.

What are the limitations and risks?

Planning software produces false precision when inputs are uncertain. A projection carried to the dollar across five years can imply a confidence level the underlying assumptions do not support.

Stale law tables are a second risk. If a vendor does not publish update timing after legislative change, the firm cannot know which law version a given scenario reflects.

Responsibility does not transfer to the vendor. The accuracy-related penalty under Internal Revenue Code section 6662 applies at 20 per cent of the underpayment attributable to negligence or substantial understatement, and software output is not a defence in itself.

Data lock-in is the risk firms notice last. Confirm the export format and whether historical scenarios remain readable after a subscription ends.

How do requirements differ outside the United States?

The functional requirements are similar, but the regulatory anchors differ. In Australia, tax agents are registered with the Tax Practitioners Board under the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 and are bound by the Code of Professional Conduct in that Act.

Security expectations are set through the ATO’s Operational Framework for digital service providers, which includes controls such as multi-factor authentication for software connecting to ATO services.

Breach obligations sit under a different regime. The Notifiable Data Breaches scheme, established under the Privacy Act 1988, requires notification to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner and to affected individuals where a breach is likely to result in serious harm.

Firms operating across both jurisdictions should confirm data residency, because the location of processing affects which rules apply.

Conclusion

The tax planning software features that matter in 2026 divide into four groups: modelling depth, data movement, control and documentation, and transparency of any AI assistance. A tool that is strong in one group and weak in another shifts work or risk onto the firm.

Legislative change since 2025 makes update cadence a primary evaluation criterion rather than a technical detail. A model that does not reflect enacted law produces advice that looks complete and is not.

Documentation deserves equal weight to calculation. Because planning output is advice rather than a filing, the record of what was assumed and when is the firm’s primary protection.

The most reliable evaluation method is unchanged: set the must have features for tax planning tools first, test each product against that list with real client scenarios, and confirm that responsibilities the firm cannot delegate remain visible in the workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is tax planning software the same as tax preparation software?

No. Tax planning software models future scenarios and produces advisory deliverables that are never lodged with a revenue authority, while tax preparation software produces the return that is filed. Some vendors sell both, but they are separate functions with different evaluation criteria.

How often should a tax planning tool update its calculation engine?

At minimum after each enacted change to tax law and after the annual inflation adjustment revenue procedure is released. Vendors should publish update timing, because the firm cannot otherwise identify which law version a saved scenario reflects.

Does tax planning software need to meet the FTC Safeguards Rule?

Yes, where the firm is subject to the rule. Tax preparers are treated as financial institutions under 16 CFR Part 314, and section 314.4(c)(5) requires multi-factor authentication for access to systems holding customer information, including hosted planning tools.

Can AI features in tax planning software be relied on without review?

No. Circular 230 section 10.35 requires practitioners to exercise competence, and that obligation is not satisfied by a software output. AI-assisted research should cite retrievable primary authority that a reviewer can independently confirm.

How long should planning scenarios and assumptions be retained?

Retention should align with the assessment period rather than software defaults. Internal Revenue Code section 6501 provides a general three-year assessment period, extending to six years where more than 25 per cent of gross income is omitted.

What is the most commonly overlooked feature during evaluation?

Data export. Firms typically assess modelling and interface quality first, then discover at renewal that historical scenarios cannot be extracted in a usable format or read after the subscription ends.

Is there a single best tax planning software for 2026?

No, because fit depends on client mix, entity types, the existing compliance stack, staffing structure and pricing model. Any ranking that ignores those variables describes vendor features rather than suitability for a specific practice.

3d:T163f5,

KEY TAKEAWAYS

Tax planning software models positions that have not yet been taken. It is never lodged with a revenue authority, so it is judged on assumption quality and documentation rather than acceptance acknowledgements.
A current-law calculation engine is the baseline requirement. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, enacted 4 July 2025, changed multiple provisions that planning models built on pre-2025 assumptions no longer reflect.
The Federal Trade Commission’s Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) requires multi-factor authentication and a written information security plan, which makes access control a purchasing requirement rather than a preference.
Audit trail and assumption logging matter because the general assessment period under Internal Revenue Code section 6501 is three years, extending to six years where more than 25 per cent of gross income is omitted.
There is no single “best tax planning software 2026” ranking. Fit depends on client mix, entity types, the existing compliance stack and staffing model.

Introduction

Anything missing from that list becomes manual work absorbed by staff, or a control gap absorbed by the firm.

Tax planning software works well past tax season. It's not just a tool, it's a game-changer for advisors who want to offer truly holistic financial planning.

How does tax planning software differ from compliance software?

The practical consequence is that documentation quality inside the software carries weight that it does not carry in a compliance tool.

Which calculation and modelling features are non-negotiable?

Why does multi-year projection matter?

Projection horizons should be configurable. Retirement, succession and instalment sale planning routinely require five to ten year views.

Why does entity comparison matter?

How current must the calculation engine be?

Smarter Tax Planning Starts Here With Our Tax Planning AI Software

AI-powered insights designed to reduce liability and increase financial efficiency.

What integration and workflow features should firms require?

At minimum, the tool should import prior-year return data from the firm’s compliance system, accept source documents, and export client deliverables in a portable format.

What security and access controls are required in 2026?

Role-based permissions should be granular enough to separate preparer, reviewer and administrator access. Shared logins defeat both the control and the audit trail.

IRS Publication 5708 provides a written information security plan template designed for smaller practices, which is a practical starting point for firms documenting these controls for the first time.

What documentation and audit trail features protect the firm?

Every scenario should record its inputs, the law version applied, the date generated and the person who generated it.

Version control also protects against a common failure mode: a client acting on a superseded scenario. If the software cannot mark a version as final and lock it, that risk sits with the firm.

Which client deliverable features actually get used?

The deliverables that get used are the ones a client can act on: a scenario comparison, an implementation checklist with responsible parties and dates, and an estimated payment schedule.

Presentation quality matters less than traceability. A deliverable that states its assumptions and effective date is more useful in twelve months than one that looks polished but is undated.

A planning tool that calculates against those thresholds produces something the client can act on directly.

How should firms evaluate AI features in tax planning tools?

Data usage terms need to be read specifically. Confirm in writing whether client data is used for model training, where it is processed, and how long it is retained.

What does “best tax planning software 2026” actually depend on?

Four factors carry most of the weight in practice:

Client mix. High-net-worth individual planning, small business entity work and multi-state clients each demand different modelling depth.
Existing compliance stack. Integration with the system already in use usually outweighs any single feature advantage.
Staffing model. Tools that assume a reviewer layer behave differently in a solo practice than in a fifteen-person firm.
Pricing structure. Per-user, per-client and per-plan pricing scale very differently as the practice grows.

What are the limitations and risks?

Planning software produces false precision when inputs are uncertain. A projection carried to the dollar across five years can imply a confidence level the underlying assumptions do not support.

Stale law tables are a second risk. If a vendor does not publish update timing after legislative change, the firm cannot know which law version a given scenario reflects.

Data lock-in is the risk firms notice last. Confirm the export format and whether historical scenarios remain readable after a subscription ends.

How do requirements differ outside the United States?

Firms operating across both jurisdictions should confirm data residency, because the location of processing affects which rules apply.

Conclusion

Documentation deserves equal weight to calculation. Because planning output is advice rather than a filing, the record of what was assumed and when is the firm’s primary protection.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is tax planning software the same as tax preparation software?

How often should a tax planning tool update its calculation engine?

Does tax planning software need to meet the FTC Safeguards Rule?

Can AI features in tax planning software be relied on without review?

How long should planning scenarios and assumptions be retained?

What is the most commonly overlooked feature during evaluation?

Is there a single best tax planning software for 2026?

d:["$","main",null,{"className":"min-h-screen","children":[["$","script",null,{"type":"application/ld+json","dangerouslySetInnerHTML":{"__html":"$35"},"suppressHydrationWarning":true}],["$","$L3a",null,{}],["$","$L3b",null,{"post":{"id":342,"title":"What Features Should Tax Planning Software Include in 2026?","heroImage":{"id":344,"alt":"What Features Should Tax Planning Software Include in 2026?","caption":null,"updatedAt":"2026-10-28T12:55:13","createdAt":"2026-10-28T12:53:16","url":"https://taxmavblog.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Tax-Planning-Software-Include-in-2026.png","thumbnailURL":"https://taxmavblog.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Tax-Planning-Software-Include-in-2026-150x150.png","filename":"Tax-Planning-Software-Include-in-2026.png","mimeType":"image/jpeg","filesize":0,"width":1680,"height":879,"focalX":50,"focalY":50,"sizes":{"thumbnail":{"url":"https://taxmavblog.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Tax-Planning-Software-Include-in-2026-150x150.png","width":150,"height":150,"mimeType":"image/jpeg","filesize":null,"filename":null},"square":{"url":"https://taxmavblog.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Tax-Planning-Software-Include-in-2026-150x150.png","width":150,"height":150,"mimeType":"image/jpeg","filesize":null,"filename":null},"small":{"url":"https://taxmavblog.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Tax-Planning-Software-Include-in-2026-300x157.png","width":300,"height":157,"mimeType":"image/jpeg","filesize":null,"filename":null},"medium":{"url":"https://taxmavblog.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Tax-Planning-Software-Include-in-2026-300x157.png","width":300,"height":157,"mimeType":"image/jpeg","filesize":null,"filename":null},"large":{"url":"https://taxmavblog.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Tax-Planning-Software-Include-in-2026-1024x536.png","width":1024,"height":536,"mimeType":"image/jpeg","filesize":null,"filename":null},"xlarge":{"url":"https://taxmavblog.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Tax-Planning-Software-Include-in-2026.png","width":1680,"height":879,"mimeType":"image/jpeg","filesize":null,"filename":null},"og":{"url":"https://taxmavblog.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Tax-Planning-Software-Include-in-2026-1024x536.png","width":1024,"height":536,"mimeType":"image/jpeg","filesize":null,"filename":null}}},"content":{"root":{"type":"root","children":[{"type":"html","children":[{"mode":"","text":"$3c","type":"text"}]}]}},"_htmlContent":"$3d","relatedPosts":[],"categories":[{"id":2,"title":"Tax Planning AI Software","generateSlug":true,"slug":"tax-planning-ai-software","parent":null,"breadcrumbs":[],"updatedAt":"2026-10-28T12:55:13","createdAt":"2026-10-28T12:53:16"}],"meta":{"title":"Tax Planning Software Features: What to Require in 2026","image":"$d:props:children:2:props:post:heroImage","description":"Tax planning software features firms should require in 2026, covering modelling, integrations, security, audit trails, AI controls and evaluation criteria."},"publishedAt":"2026-10-28T12:53:16","authors":[1],"populatedAuthors":[{"id":1,"name":"taxmavblog"}],"generateSlug":true,"slug":"tax-planning-software-features-2026","updatedAt":"2026-10-28T12:55:13","createdAt":"2026-10-28T12:53:16","_status":"published"}}],"$L3e","$L3f"]}] 10:null 16:[["$","title","0",{"children":"Tax Planning Software Features: What to Require in 2026"}],["$","meta","1",{"name":"description","content":"Tax planning software features firms should require in 2026, covering modelling, integrations, security, audit trails, AI controls and evaluation criteria."}],["$","meta","2",{"name":"author","content":"Tax Maverick"}],["$","meta","3",{"name":"keywords","content":"tax planning ai software,ai tax planning software,tax planning software,tax strategy software,tax planning strategies,tax strategist certification,secure tax software,tax software pricing,tax strategy group,tax industry trends,CPA tax planning software,tax advisor software"}],["$","meta","4",{"name":"creator","content":"Tax Maverick"}],["$","meta","5",{"name":"robots","content":"index, follow"}],["$","meta","6",{"name":"googlebot","content":"index, follow, max-video-preview:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-snippet:-1"}],["$","meta","7",{"name":"category","content":"Business Software"}],["$","link","8",{"rel":"canonical","href":"https://taxmaverick.ai/blogs/tax-planning-software-features-2026"}],["$","meta","9",{"name":"google-site-verification","content":"zKpJFQcxBb6XzPuMpFhuBgQ1wAnmjyCdu4micE8Ti_4"}],["$","meta","10",{"property":"og:title","content":"Tax Planning Software Features: What to Require in 2026"}],["$","meta","11",{"property":"og:description","content":"Tax planning software features firms should require in 2026, covering modelling, integrations, security, audit trails, AI controls and evaluation criteria."}],["$","meta","12",{"property":"og:url","content":"https://taxmaverick.ai/blogs/tax-planning-software-features-2026"}],["$","meta","13",{"property":"og:site_name","content":"Tax Maverick"}],["$","meta","14",{"property":"og:locale","content":"en_US"}],["$","meta","15",{"property":"og:image","content":"https://taxmavblog.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Tax-Planning-Software-Include-in-2026-1024x536.png"}],["$","meta","16",{"property":"og:image:type","content":"image/png"}],["$","meta","17",{"property":"og:image:width","content":"1200"}],["$","meta","18",{"property":"og:image:height","content":"630"}],["$","meta","19",{"property":"og:image:alt","content":"Tax Planning Software Features: What to Require in 2026"}],["$","meta","20",{"property":"og:type","content":"website"}],["$","meta","21",{"name":"twitter:card","content":"summary_large_image"}],["$","meta","22",{"name":"twitter:site","content":"@taxmaverick"}],["$","meta","23",{"name":"twitter:creator","content":"@taxmaverick"}],["$","meta","24",{"name":"twitter:title","content":"Tax Planning Software Features: What to Require in 2026"}],["$","meta","25",{"name":"twitter:description","content":"Tax planning software features firms should require in 2026, covering modelling, integrations, security, audit trails, AI controls and evaluation criteria."}],["$","meta","26",{"name":"twitter:image","content":"https://taxmavblog.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Tax-Planning-Software-Include-in-2026-1024x536.png"}],["$","link","27",{"rel":"icon","href":"/favicon-tm.ico","type":"image/x-icon"}],["$","$L40","28",{}]]